Legal Opinion

Drysdale v. Beachnau

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1960No. Docket 9, Calendar 48,144PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

This is an appeal from the denial by the Ingham county circuit court of plaintiffs’ bill of complaint seeking to restrain the operation of defendants’ garbage dump because of claimed zoning ordinance violation.

Plaintiffs are neighboring property owners in a rural area of Ingham county — the nearest of whose residences to the dump in question appears from the testimony to be 1/4 of a mile. They seek injunctive relief, relying on an agricultural zoning provision in a township zoning ordinance enacted in 1954.

Defendants contend that the garbage dump operation at the site in question preceded the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Township of West Bloomfield v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Leigh v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Troutman v. AikenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Blough v. SteffensMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Rapasadi v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Maricopa County v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Board of Selectmen of Wrentham v. MonsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  4. Warholak v. Northfield Township SupervisorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Moskovic v. City of New BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API