Legal Opinion
Mars Hill & Blaine Water Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 2, 1979PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODFREY, Justice.
Mars Hill & Blaine Water Company, Wal-doboro Water Company, Greenville Water Company, Northern Water Company, and Eastport Water Company (“Water Companies”) seek this Court’s review of certain decisions rendered by the Public Utilities Commission during 1977 in their rate cases. We affirm the Commission’s decision in each of those cases.
Each of the Water Companies is a member of the same family of water companies certain members of which sought review of Commission actions in Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, Me., 381 A.2d 1080 (1977). The Water…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
- Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Plainfield v. Public Service Electric and Gas CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.