Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Meyer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 20, 1908No. 49PublishedCited by 37 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

This case is here by appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. • The case originated in an action brought against the then Postmaster General (Mr. Payne) to compel him to- enter and transmit. certain publications of the complainants, Houghton, Mifflin & Company, as second class matter instead of third class as ruled by the Postmaster General; and the bill prayed an injunction restraining the Postmaster General from refusing to transmit them at second class matter rates. A restraining order was issued upon the filing of the. bill on May 31, 1902, in the following terms:

“Upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Houghton v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Yuengling v. JohnsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia · 1877

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Coyne-Delany Co., Inc. v. Capital Development Board of the State of Illinois, Defendant-Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Hanover Insurance Company, Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Buddy Systems, Inc., a California Corporation v. Exer-Genie, Inc., a Corporation, and E. E. HolkesvickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  4. Berthold-Jennings Lumber Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. McKnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API