Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Martha Bradstreet in the Matter of James Jackson Ex Dem. Martha Bradstreet v. Daniel Thomas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1830PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

29 U.S. 102

4 Pet. 102

7 L.Ed. 796

EX PARTE MARTHA BRADSTREET; IN THE MATTER OF JAMES

JACKSON EX DEM. MARTHA BRADSTREET

v.

DANIEL THOMAS.

January Term, 1830

AT January term 1829, on motion of Mr Key, and on affidavit filed, the court granted a rule on the honourable Alfred Conklin, district judge of the northern district of New York, to show cause why he did not sign a certain bill of exceptions tendered to him on the part of the plaintiff, in the case of James Jackson ex dem. of Martha Bradstreet vs. Daniel Thomas; which cause had been tried before him, and a verdict given for the defendant. The…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Marshall.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackson ex dem. Bradstreet v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Hunnicutt v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Brown v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  4. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Edelhoff & Rinke v. Horner-Miller Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API