Legal Opinion

State v. Isaacson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 8, 1987No. 86-311PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The defendant, Judith Isaacson, was convicted after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) of the sale of a controlled drug. RSA 318-B:26. The only issue properly raised on appeal is whether the trial court erred in excluding testimony concerning the conduct and activities of a fellow officer involved in the same undercover drug investigation as the State’s chief witness. We affirm the conviction.

In the spring of 1985, the Farmington Police Department contacted the Sanford (Maine) Police Department for assistance in conducting an undercover drug investigation in Farmington. Detective…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Geoffrey HonneusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. DellorfanoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. James Edward S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. State v. GoodenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. State v. DugasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API