Flower Cab Co. v. Petitte
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NORDBERG, District Judge.
The plaintiffs instituted this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to contest the Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Services of the City of Chicago’s (“the Commissioner”) unilateral imposition of a moratorium on the transfer of taxicab licenses. 1 Plaintiffs Checker Cab Co. (“Checker”) and Yellow Cab Co. (“Yellow”) have filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to Count I of their three-count amended complaint. Count I alleges that the imposition of this moratorium violated plaintiffs’ due process and equal protection rights…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boonstra v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Campbell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Illinois Transportation Trade Ass'n v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Dilanjian Taxi Services, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- M & Z CAB CORP. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.