Rutland Herald v. Vermont State Police and Office of the Attorney General
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Dooley, J.,
¶ 41. concurring in part and dissenting in part. I
concur with the majority decision that 1 V.S.A. § 317(c)(5) exempts from public access executive branch records dealing with the detection and investigation of crime, even if the criminal investigation is complete. I think that result is required by the wording of the statute, irrespective of the policy arguments of the Herald. I also do not believe the statute, so construed, violates Article 6 of Chapter I of the Vermont Constitution. I add only that the exemption appears overbroad and prevents public oversight of how law…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fielding M. McGehee III v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Cadc 79-12 the Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. Griffin B. BellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- State v. TallmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- In Re Sealed DocumentsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- LaChapelle v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.