Legal Opinion

LaChapelle v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 2, 1945PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This is a complaint under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 93, § 4, alleging in substance that the respondent has created and maintains a monopoly in the manufacture and sale of machinery for making shoes, and praying for the appointment of a master in accordance with the provisions of that section. The Superior Court issued an order to the respondent to show cause, and the trial judge reports for our determination the correctness of his refusal to vacate or quash the order. The only question presented and argued is whether the procedure set up by §§ 4-7, inclusive, is unconstitutional as an attempt to…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Shadwick v. City of TampaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. O'Coin's, Inc. v. Treasurer of the County of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Carrick v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Paro v. Longwood HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API