Legal Opinion
In Re Sealed Documents
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 23, 2001No. 01-103PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
Appellants the Associated Press, The Herald Association, d/b/a The Rutland Herald, Times Argus Association d/b/a The Times Argus, and Mt. Mansfield Television, Inc., d/b/a WCAX/WPTZ appeal from a district court order denying a motion to unseal ten search warrants and related materials involving searches of the persons and the residences of Robert Tulloch and James Parker in Chelsea, Vermont. Appellants contend they are entitled to examine the subject documents under Vermont statutory law — specifically 4 V.S.A. § 693 providing for public inspection and examination of court records — as well…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. BauderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Shahi v. Ascend Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Martin v. STATE, DEPT. OF MOTOR VEHICLESSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- In Re Search WarrantsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.