Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hyatt v. Hill

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1986No. 19899Published

1ConcurrenceHowe, Justice

I concur in the result denying the defendant a trial by jury. However, I believe that the majority too narrowly construes article I, section 10 of the Utah Constitution to mean merely that “the constitutional right to a trial by jury is preserved and currently exists only in actions so triable when the constitution was adopted.” The majority then reasons that because in 1895 when our constitution was adopted there was no action to require a putative father to contribute to the support of his illegitimate offspring, the defendant has no right to a jury trial in this paternity action. I believe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Colon v. LiskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Smith v. RobbinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Williams v. HerbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Waddell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API