Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Williams v. Herbert

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1915No. 19,474PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Barber district court; Preston B. Gillett, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him in a bastardy proceeding, and assigns error upon the amount of the payments required, alleging them to be excessive, and upon the ruling denying him a jury trial.

The trial court considered the age, education, property and environment of the defendant and concluded that $150 a year in quarterly payments, until the child should reach the age of eighteen years, was reasonable, and provided for a lump sum payment at any time at the option of the defendant. The amount in such cases is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex. rel. Curtis v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. In re RolfsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Poole v. FrenchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Costigan v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Bales v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SpeedWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Karnes Enterprises, Inc. v. QuanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Mayer v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Wingard v. SillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Waters v. RileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API