Legal Opinion

Burk v. Hill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 28 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The sole question presented by the record is, whether the court erred in sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, which is as follows:

“ Matilda Burk and Mary E. Thomas, plaintiffs, complain of John L. Hill and, Mary E. Hill, defendants, and say, that said defendants on the 25th day of February, 1871, by their indenture of that date duly acknowledged, a copy of which indenture and acknowledgment is filed herewith, marked ‘ A/ conveyed to said plaintiffs the following described lands in Montgomery county,. Indiana, to wit: Beginning at a point on the west line of J. A. Powers’ out-lot numbered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
  2. Van Wagner v. NostrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  3. Whitbeck v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  4. Beach v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Kellogg v. IngersollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Huyck v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Douglass v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API