Legal Opinion

United States v. Provost

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 12, 1991No. 64,239; CM 8900412PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, appellant pleaded guilty to two specifications of absence without leave and one specification of attempted larceny of a motor bike, in violation of Articles 86 and 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886 and 880, respectively. During the hearing on sentence, appellant made an unsworn statement in extenuation and mitigation wherein he related a history of alcohol abuse. He attributed his absences and at*99tempted larceny to his desire to get out of the Army and claimed that his sole motivation for committing the offenses…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. RosatoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. MarcumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  2. United States v. SimoyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. MartinsmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. MartinsmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. SatterleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API