Legal Opinion

Driver v. Smith

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 24, 1918PublishedCited by 15 opinions

On bill, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, V. C.

This is a final hearing. Three bills were filed by complainant against defendants Ered Smith, James Travers and Howard Saylor to enforce negative covenants contained in contracts entered into between complainant and said defendants on June 1st, 1918, under the provisions of which said defendants agreed to enter the service of complainant, for a period of two years, from July 1st, 1918, and agreed that they should not either directly or indirectly be connected or concerned in any other business or person whatsoever during the said two years of service. To the *341bills said defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Rowland v. New York Stable Manure Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Allen v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  4. Sergio Rodriguez v. Raymours Furniture(074603)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  5. Girard Trust Co. v. SchmitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API