United States v. Symister
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
CANELLOS, Judge:
Before a special court-martial with members, the accused was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of violating a lawful general regulation [Air Force Regulation 30-17, Safeguarding Controlled Items (Test Material) Information],1 by possessing, without authority, a Specialty Knowledge Test (S.K.T.). The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge and reduction to airman basic.
On appeal, the accused assigns nine errors for our consideration; we will discuss only one. That is the military judge failed to instruct sua sponte on the defense of mistake of fact.
Before…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. KunakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. VerdiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. StewartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. CannonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.