Legal Opinion

United States v. Symister

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 7, 1984No. ACM S26261Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

CANELLOS, Judge:

Before a special court-martial with members, the accused was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of violating a lawful general regulation [Air Force Regulation 30-17, Safeguarding Controlled Items (Test Material) Information],1 by possessing, without authority, a Specialty Knowledge Test (S.K.T.). The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge and reduction to airman basic.

On appeal, the accused assigns nine errors for our consideration; we will discuss only one. That is the military judge failed to instruct sua sponte on the defense of mistake of fact.

Before…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. KunakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. VerdiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. StewartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. CannonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API