Legal Opinion
Katz v. Katz
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 16, 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
WEFING, J.A.D.
Defendant appeals from two orders entered in the trial court by two different judges. The first order denied defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction. The second order reflects the court’s conclusion that the Uniform Gift to Minors Act (UGMA) (N.J.S.A. 46:38-13) precludes a custodian-parent from using the funds in a custodial UGMA account to pay for a child’s college expenses.1 In the second order, defendant was directed to reimburse his daughter $25,406.15, the amount he had taken from the UGMA account to pay…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Eastboro Foundation Charitable Trust v. PenzerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Robertsson v. MiseticAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- Tatham v. TathamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- C.L. v. W.S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Gallegos v. FrezzaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.