Legal Opinion
C.L. v. W.S.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 17, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■ The opinion of the court was delivered by
SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.
The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether defendant’s act of impregnating plaintiff in New Jersey in 1986 and substantial other contacts with New Jersey around that time were sufficient to support the New Jersey courts’ jurisdiction over *487defendant with respect to plaintiffs claims for a declaration of paternity and child support under the Parentage Act, N.J.S.A. 9:17-38 to -59.
According to plaintiffs certifications, she was engaged to and had an exclusive sexual relationship with defendant in the mid-1980s. She lived in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Charles Gendler & Co. v. Telecom Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tatham v. TathamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES O/B/O KATHERINE CALCANO VS. ANGELO E. MATEO (FD-09-1173-19, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020