Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Harper

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1959No. 675PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

The allegations of the complaint with respect to reckless driving and failure to keep -a reasonable look-out are not supported by the evidence, -or by any reasonable inference that may be -drawn therefrom, and further discussion thereof is unwarranted.

The decisive inquiry is whether, at the time of the collision in question, the defendant Plarper was driving the pickup -on the west (his left) side of the center line of th-e road in violation of G.S. 20-146 or G.S. 20-148, -as alleged by the plaintiff. If so, such conduct was negli gence per se. Hoke v. Greyhound Corp., 226 N.C. 692, 698, 40…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sowers v. MarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Lane v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Parker v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Bondurant v. MastinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. State v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Jenkins v. STARRETT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Stephens v. Southern Oil Co. of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API