Carmona v. Padilla
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Botein, J. P.
Upon the assumption that the jury, in returning a verdict in the infant plaintiff’s favor, accepted her version of the happening of the accident, the following facts are implicit in the verdict.
The appellant, who is the only one of several defendants against whom a verdict was rendered, is the grandmother of the infant defendant. The infant plaintiff was 15 months old at the time of the accident. Her parents, in the course of a social visit, had brought her to the two-family house owned and in part occupied by appellant and her husband. The family of the infant defendant also…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Steinberg v. CauchoisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Travell v. . BannermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- De Ryss v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Schultz v. MorrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1915
- Kuchlik v. Feuer, FeuerNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nolechek v. GesualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Poncher v. BrackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Morris v. Toy BoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Young v. DalidowiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Acquaviva v. PiazzollaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.