Legal Opinion

Berg Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 11, 1929No. H-436PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSinnott, Judge

Plaintiff in this suit seeks to recover the sum of $11,370.49, manufacturer’s excise tax paid during the period from May, 1922, to February, 1926, on timers manufactured by plaintiff.

*168The sole question involved is whether the sold by plaintiff is taxable under section 900 of the revenue act of 1921, 42 Stat. 227, 291, arid section 600 of the revenue act of 1924, 43 Stat. 253, 322. The timer made by plaintiff may be used on any Ford engine. They may be used without change on the engine used in either the Ford tractor or automobile. The only difference in the timer made by plaintiff and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atwater Kent Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  2. Milwaukee Motor Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  3. Wells Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Lead Batteries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  2. Advance Automobile Accessories Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Blueblaze Motor Specialties Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  4. White Brass Castings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API