Legal Opinion

Wells Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 22, 1928No. H-44PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiNNOtt, Judge

The plaintiff in this case is suing for the refund of excise taxes collected from the plaintiff by the United States, under the revenue acts of 1918, 1921, and 1924, with respect to spark coils and timers manufactured and sold by plaintiff.

The case was referred to a commissioner of this court for a finding and report to the court of the facts. The said commissioner filed his report on March 6, 1928. Neither the plaintiff nor the defendant has filed exceptions to the commissioner’s report.

It is admitted in defendant’s brief that the essential facts and issues of law, with respect to this case,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atwater Kent Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Lead Batteries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  2. Berg Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  3. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  4. Jefferson Electric Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API