Lafayette Auvergne Corp. v. 10243 Management Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. Pursuant to the lease and the alterations agreement governing the subject premises and the permission granted thereunder by the defendants’ predecessor, a mere legal right to construct the skylight at issue, not an easement of light and air, was conferred. Light and air form valuable easements to be created by express agreement (Elgar v. Kress & Co., 280 App. Div. 621) and, generally speaking, if an easement is to result, the intent on the part of a landowner to impose a servitude upon his land must be clear. (People ex…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pirman v. ConferNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Moore v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Moore v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- People ex rel. Standard Gas Light Co. v. CantorNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- Elgar v. S. H. Kress & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chatsworth Realty 344 LLC v. Hudson Waterfront Company A, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Sheinberg v. 177 E. 77, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Levin v. 117 Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002