Legal Opinion

Sheinberg v. 177 E. 77, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered on or about October 8, 1997, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ cross motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ first amended complaint and denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered September 25, 1997, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed within the appeal from the judgment.

The motion court reviewed the allegations of the first amended complaint pursuant to the appropriate standard (see, Kliebert v…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Walkovszky v. CarltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Barash v. PA. TERM. REAL ESTATE CORP.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Sohn v. CalderonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Triumph Advertising Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Kliebert v. McKoanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheridan Broadcasting Corp. v. Sydney SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. MJK Bldg. Corp. v. Fayland Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. East Hampton Union Free School District v. Sandpebble Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API