Legal Opinion

Hornstein v. Podwitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 25, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action as against the respondents Mersel and Hirschhorn. It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, was employed by the defendants Hadassah Realty Corporation and Podwitz as a broker to procure a purchaser for the sale of real estate; that he procured the respondents Mersel and Hirschhorn as purchasers upon terms satisfactory to the employers; that due to his efforts a written contract was entered into between the Hadassah Realty Corporation and the respondents; that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. . GatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Gonzales v. Kentucky Derby Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Gonzales v. . ReichenthalerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hornstein v. PodwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Potter v. MinskoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  3. Hornstein v. PodwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Infusino v. PelnikNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API