Gonzales v. . Reichenthaler
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 19, 1921, which modified and affirmed .as modified an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 19, 1921, which modified and affirmed .as modified an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendant Kentucky Derby Co., Inc., under which the company leased to the plaintiff “ One ten-horse Kentucky Derby device or game ” and agreed that it would not operate, sell or lease' “ any other Kentucky Derby game or…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; first and second questions certified not answered; third question answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cabdozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Dior v. MiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Klauder v. CregarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.