Hornstein v. Podwitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The plaintiff’s prima facie case established all the essential elements entitling him to recover brokerage commissions from the corporate defendant. At the request of such defendant he disclosed to its president his proposed purchasers, the defendants Mersel and Hirschhorn, and a contract of purchase and sale resulted. The plaintiff was thus entitled to his commissions, notwithstanding the final negotiations which resulted in a meeting of the minds of the parties were conducted by the defendant owner. (Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Company, 83 N. Y. 378.)
The basis of the plaintiff’s cause of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Hornstein v. PodwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
- Potter v. Salina-Genesee Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959