Legal Opinion

Hornstein v. Podwitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff’s prima facie case established all the essential elements entitling him to recover brokerage commissions from the corporate defendant. At the request of such defendant he disclosed to its president his proposed purchasers, the defendants Mersel and Hirschhorn, and a contract of purchase and sale resulted. The plaintiff was thus entitled to his commissions, notwithstanding the final negotiations which resulted in a meeting of the minds of the parties were conducted by the defendant owner. (Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Company, 83 N. Y. 378.)

The basis of the plaintiff’s cause of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Hornstein v. PodwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Potter v. Salina-Genesee Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API