Legal Opinion

Gladowski v. Felczak

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1943No. Appeal, 45PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

This case involves the application of the doctrines of “unjust enrichment” and “restitution” — modern terms of legal nomenclature which have come largely to supplant the former designation of “quasi-contracts.”

The earlier events in the controversy out of which the present action arises are recited in the opinion of the Court in Polish Falcons of America v. American Citizens Club for Poles of Natrona, 338 Pa. 218, 13 A. 2d 27. Polish Falcons, Nest No. 290 of Natrona, an unincorporated, subordinate lodge of Polish Falcons of America, was the owner of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. General Casmir Pulaski Building & Loan Ass'n v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Thees v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Haverford Loan & Building Ass'n v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Stonecipher v. KeaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Puharic v. NovySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. King v. PelkofskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Bill v. GattavaraWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. James A. Lewis, Esquire, Trustee for Joseph M. Eaton Builders, Inc. v. Thomas J. And Linda M. DiethornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Ramsey v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Mitchell v. AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API