Legal Opinion

Lively & Son v. Inman, Akers & Inman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 10, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Meadow. Gwinnett superior court. July 6, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

1. “An exception to an auditor’s report, which requires for its determination a consideration of some part or parts of the brief of evidence, is incomplete when the evidence necessary to be considered in passing- thereon is neither incorporated therein, nor attached thereto as an.exhibit, nor specifically pointed out in the.brief of the evidence.” Brock v. Wildey, 132 Ga. 19 (63 S. E. 794).

*11August 10, 1910. Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Meadow. Gwinnett superior court. July 6, 1909. N. L. Hutchins, for plaintiffs in error. 7. L. Oal-es, contra.

2. In the trial of exceptions of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brock v. WildeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Mobley v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Fuqua v. HaddenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Loftis v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API