Legal Opinion

Grant v. Hart

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1944No. 14779PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworti-i, Justice.

In ground 4 of the motion for new trial exception is" taken to the charge on the ground that the court instructed the jury generally on the law and the facts as in ordinary cases, and did not -confine the charge to the special issues of fact submitted to the jury. Error is claimed here because the court, after instructing the jury that the case was based upon alleged fraud and deceit practiced upon the petitioners by the defendant, acting with and through others, instructed the jury that if they should reach the conclusion that the defendant was not guilty of the fraud…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Traders Insurance v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Smith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Peeples v. RudulphSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Eiberger v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Raven v. Dodd's Auto Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Atlanta Journal Co. v. DoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  5. Williams v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API