Legal Opinion

Kornbrodt v. Equitable Trust Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1931PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an action to recover for breach of an alleged promise. The complaint in substance alleges as the inducement for the promise that plaintiff purchased from defendant certain bonds of two irrigation districts of the state of Idaho; that both of said districts have since defaulted in the payment of the bonds and that the bonds are now of no value; that plaintiff sold a part of said bonds so purchased to Clark Kendall and Company; that, upon the district becoming insolvent, Clark Kendall and Company threatened to bring suit against plaintiff because of its purchase of said bonds from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Lewis v. SiegmanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. First National Bank v. CecilOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Macurda v. Lewiston Journal Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  5. Davies v. ReaOregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Drummond v. City of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Tarjan v. National Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  4. Ollilo v. Clatskanie Peoples' Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Moyer v. Columbia State BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API