Legal Opinion

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports

Decided December 14, 1989No. 89-904Published

1Opinion of the Court

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP Attorney General : OPINION : No. 89-904 : of : December 14, 1989 : JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP : Attorney General : : RODNEY O. LILYQUIST : Deputy Attorney General : : THE HONORABLE WILLIAM E. DAVIS, DIRECTOR OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS FOR THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, has requested an opinion on the following question: May a retired judge serving on a superior court by assignment of the Chief Justice lawfully be paid a $250 to $350 per diem fee by the county for his or her services if the judge waives…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Ukiah v. FonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. County of Madera v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Pickens v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API