Mono County Irrigation Co. v. State
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and John T. Nourse, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
These cases involve the same principle and may, therefore, be considered together. Each was an action brought in the superior court of Mono County for the purpose of condemning certain lands for reservoir purposes, and alleged to be owned by the state of California and situated within the boundaries of a United States forest reserve, to wit, the Mono forest reserve, in said Mono County. The lands were reserved and set apart as reserved forest lands by the act of Congress approved October 1, 1890 (26 U. S. Stats. at Large, p. 650, [7 Fed. Stats. Ann., p. 309, 5 U. S. Comp. Stats. (1916), sec.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hibberd v. SlackU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1897
- Hinton v. Winsor & Uinta Coal & Mining Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1880
- Doom v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900
- Brigham City v. Toltec Ranch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Palmer & Co. v. MerrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leoke v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Sylvester v. KirkpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Ritzman v. RitzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Sylvester v. KirkpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947