Legal Opinion
Mid-South Insurance v. Doe
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided July 28, 2003No. 2:02-1789-18PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NORTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I. Background
The parties have stipulated to the following facts. John Doe and Jane Doe (the “Does”) are husband and wife and are citizens and residents of Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. Frank Roe and Mary Roe (the “Roes”) are husband and wife and also are citizens and residents of Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. Jane Doe and Mary Roe are sisters. Mid-South Insurance Company (“Mid-South”) and Celtic Insurance Company…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Perini Corporation v. Perini Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roibas v. EBPA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018