Legal Opinion
Roibas v. EBPA, LLC
District Court, D. Maine
Decided September 28, 2018No. Docket No. 1:17-cv-020-NTPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Nancy Torresen, United States Chief District Judge
The parties to this action dispute the terms of the MaineGeneral Health Employee Health Plan (the "Plan "), of which Plaintiff Melissa True is a beneficiary. The Plan is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA "). This matter comes before me on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record filed by the Plaintiffs (ECF No. 50) and by Defendant MaineGeneral Health ("MaineGeneral " or the "administrator ") (ECF No. 48). For the reasons set out below, I DENY the Plaintiffs' motion and I GRANT MaineGeneral's motion.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Simon v. Value Behavioral Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.