Legal Opinion
United States v. Consolidated Mayflower Mines, Inc., Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds and Stichting Mayflower Recreational Fonds, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees, and 18.57 Acres Land, More or Less Located in Central Wasatch County, State of Utah, United States of America v. 18.57 Acres of Land, More or Less Located in Central Wasatch County, State of Utah, and Consolidated Mayflower Mines, Inc., Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds, Stichting Mayflower Recreational Fonds, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 24, 1995No. 93-4138Published
1Opinion of the Court
60 F.3d 1470
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CONSOLIDATED MAYFLOWER MINES, INC., Defendant-Appellant,
Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds and Stichting Mayflower
Recreational Fonds, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees,
and
18.57 Acres Land, more or less located in Central Wasatch
County, State of Utah, Defendant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
18.57 ACRES OF LAND, more or less located in Central Wasatch
County, State of Utah, Defendant,
and
Consolidated Mayflower Mines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee,
Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds, Stichting Mayflower
Recreational Fonds,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McCandless v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Montana Railway Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.