Legal Opinion

Industrial Carving Co. v. Hurst

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Special Justice, Eeby L. Jenkins

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This suit brought by Lester Hurst, hereinafter referred to as the employee, to recover certain benefits allegedly due him under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The trial court awarded the employee sixty-five (65%) percent permanent partial disability to his body as a. whole and medical bills, and from this award, the employer appealed to this court.

The facts of the case are undisputed. The record discloses that the employee suffered a back injury in 1957 while in the employ of Forest Products Corporation, and was awarded…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hebert v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Harrington v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Knoxville Knitting Mills Co. v. GalyonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Jones v. Cutler Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Asplund Construction Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Freeman United Coal Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Employers-Commercial Union Companies v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Allkins v. Thomas Furniture Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Harlan v. McClellanTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Partin v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API