Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. Hall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1933No. 29,124PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

The appeal is from an order denying a motion to vacate an ex parte order making the appellant a party defendant in the action.

Plaintiffs are the beneficiaries under a trust in which the three defendants are trustees. Their complaint alleges that the defendant trustees were dissipating the estate and sought their removal, an accounting, and other relief. The interveners made a similar charge as to another trust having the same origin.

The order is appealable, though the ex parte order is not. Sundberg v. Goar, 92 Minn. 143, 99 N. W. 638; Security State Bank v. Brecht, 150 Minn. 502, 185 N. W.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Sundberg v. GoarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Johnson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Webster v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. In Re Trust Created by Will of EngerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Leraan v. Aftenro SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Luethi v. StankoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API