Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fite v. Saddler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1991No. 91-1238PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We grant respondents’ motion for summary judgment and deny the writ.

Respondents first state that summary judgment is appropriate because the only factual issue in dispute—whether Schisler learned that his filing fee was deficient on the evening of February 21, 1991, the last day for filing, or on the next day, February 22, 1991—is immaterial. We agree and find that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. Civ.R. 56(C).

*172Respondents next argue that, as no quasi-judicial act took place, prohibition is an improper remedy. They cite several cases in which this court has declared that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stern v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State ex rel. Graham v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Kendzia v. CarneyOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thurn v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Committee for the Charter Amendment Petition v. City of AvonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Stutzman v. Madison County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API