City of Rochester v. Baker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, and new trial granted. Memorandum: This proceeding seeks a determination of damages owing to respondents for condemnation of their laundromat property. The trial court rejected the city’s appraisal in toto and under that circumstance felt compelled to adopt the respondents’ appraisal value without adjustment, although it commented that the value appeared "excessive”. It was within the power of the court to adjust the evidence submitted to arrive at a fair value of the property (Leonard v State of New York, 33 AD2d 711, 712).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Rose v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Belinky v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Vircillo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Leonard v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- NYCO Minerals, Inc. v. Town of LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002