Legal Opinion

Vircillo v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 23, 1965No. Claim No. 41171PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: In affirming the award made by the Trial Judge we disapprove the method of proof employed by claimant. To establish the value of the property taken, the State introduced evidence of *535comparable sales and also the appraisal o£ a qualified expert based upon those sales. However, claimant relied solely upon the opinion of a licensed real estate broker, who gave no supporting data for his opinion, which was based upon none of the scientific approaches to- real estate valuation. Under the facts and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the New York Transit AuhorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Shore Haven Apartments No. 6, Inc. v. Commissioner of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Rozen v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. City of Rochester v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API