Legal Opinion

People v. Hinspeter

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John P. DiBlasi, J.

Amended in 2000 as part of the Sexual Assault Reform Act, and effective February 1, 2001, CPL 530.50 provides that:

“A judge who is otherwise authorized pursuant to section 460.50 or section 460.60 to issue an order of *615recognizance or bail pending the determination of an appeal, may do so unless the defendant received a class A felony sentence or a sentence for a felony, other than a class D or class E felony, defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law and committed or attempted to be committed against a person less than eighteen years of age”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Gold v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Gold v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Cox v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hinspeter v. SenkowskiNew York Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People ex rel. Hinspeter v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API