Legal Opinion

Cox v. Katz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the decision of the Appellate Division and concur with the views expressed in its opinion. We would simply add a few lines to point up the federal questions urged upon us by the plaintiffs.

There is no basis for the application of the “ one man-one vote” principle to the present case. That doctrine, designed to assure representative government in a democracy such as ours, was never intended to regulate the election of judges whose functions are solely judicial. There is neither reason nor justification for a requirement that judges be distributed or allocated throughout a state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Buchanan v. RhodesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1966
  3. New York State Ass'n of Trial Lawyers v. RockefellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Stokes v. FortsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1964
  5. Kail v. RockefellerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Objections to the Nomination Petition of CavanaughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Dorfman v. BermanNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Catapano v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. People v. HinspeterNew York Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Held v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API