Cox v. Katz
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We agree with the decision of the Appellate Division and concur with the views expressed in its opinion. We would simply add a few lines to point up the federal questions urged upon us by the plaintiffs.
There is no basis for the application of the “ one man-one vote” principle to the present case. That doctrine, designed to assure representative government in a democracy such as ours, was never intended to regulate the election of judges whose functions are solely judicial. There is neither reason nor justification for a requirement that judges be distributed or allocated throughout a state…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Buchanan v. RhodesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1966
- New York State Ass'n of Trial Lawyers v. RockefellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Stokes v. FortsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1964
- Kail v. RockefellerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Objections to the Nomination Petition of CavanaughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Dorfman v. BermanNew York Supreme Court · 2000
- Catapano v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. HinspeterNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Held v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.