Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hinspeter v. Senkowski

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John P. DiBlasi, J.

“Although there is no absolute federal constitutional right to bail pending appeal, once a state makes provisions for such bail, the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require that it not be denied arbitrarily or unreasonably” (Pulaski v Hopkins, 745 F Supp 882, 885 [ED NY 1990]). In this case of first impression, the court is asked to declare CPL 530.50 (hereinafter section 530.50) unconstitutional on the grounds that it violates petitioner’s rights to due process of law and equal protection of the law under both the Federal and State Constitutions…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hinspeter v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. (2007), Maryland Attorney General Reports2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API