Legal Opinion

Tschida v. Rowe

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2003No. 02-265PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Perry Tschida (Tschida), Robert Rowe, Jr. (Rowe), and James Whaley (Whaley) own residential rental property in Missoula, Montana. A dispute arose over management of the property and Tschida sued Rowe. After Tschida failed to file a reply to a Counterclaim filed by Rowe and intervenor Whaley within the time mandated by the District Court, the court granted a default judgment against Tschida and in favor of Rowe and Whaley. Tschida moved to have the default judgment set aside and the District Court denied the motion. Tschida appeals from the denial of his motion to set aside the default…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bahm v. SouthworthMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Greenup v. RussellMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Karlen v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re Marriage of WincklerMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re the Marriage of BroereMontana Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Engelsberger v. Lake CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cox v. Rocky Mtn. BankMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Gollnick v. GollnickMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Matthews v. Don K ChevroletMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Matthews v. Don K ChevroletMontana Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API