Legal Opinion

State v. Holbach

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2014No. 20130016PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Mitchell Holbach appeals from an order: (1) finding he was not competent to understand the proceedings against him and assist in his defense in a criminal prosecution for terrorizing; (2) suspending the prosecution against him; (3) ordering him committed to the care and custody of the State Hospital with directions for annual evaluations to determine whether he has attained competency to understand the proceedings against him and assist in his defense; and (4) ordering dismissal of the charges if he has not attained competency by March 2016. Holbach argues the district court clearly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Ludwig v. BurchillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Feland v. P.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. VanNattaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GlaserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. RollandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. ThesingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. RollandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API