State v. Glaser
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Gary Glaser appeals from a criminal judgment entered after he pled guilty to indecent exposure. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering Glaser to register as a sex offender. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Glaser was charged with indecent exposure, a class A misdemeanor. He allegedly pulled up to a stranger walking on a sidewalk, stopped his vehicle, and exposed his penis to the victim. Glaser initially pled not guilty. After being provided a court-appointed attorney, he entered a guilty plea.
[¶ 3] At the sentencing hearing, Glaser argued he should not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. WardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. KurucNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Matter of Adoption of KSHNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MontplaisirNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HoukomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- City of Williston v. WerkmeisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. WattsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.