Legal Opinion

State v. Glaser

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2015No. 20140174PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Gary Glaser appeals from a criminal judgment entered after he pled guilty to indecent exposure. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering Glaser to register as a sex offender. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Glaser was charged with indecent exposure, a class A misdemeanor. He allegedly pulled up to a stranger walking on a sidewalk, stopped his vehicle, and exposed his penis to the victim. Glaser initially pled not guilty. After being provided a court-appointed attorney, he entered a guilty plea.

[¶ 3] At the sentencing hearing, Glaser argued he should not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. KurucNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Matter of Adoption of KSHNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MontplaisirNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. HoukomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. City of Williston v. WerkmeisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. WattsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API