Legal Opinion

Prospect Gardens Convalescent Home v. Norwalk

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 11, 1975No. File No. 105076PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff owns and operates a convalescent home on Prospect Avenue, Norwalk. It operates and leases, as places of residence for a number of its employees, three homes in the immediate vicinity located, respectively, on Finley Street, Fairview Avenue, and Spruce Street. The employees' duties, for the most part, seem to involve routine maintenance and care of the patients in the main building.

I

The three homes are single-family dwellings, all situated in residence zones. The predominant character of the area is one-family residential.

The employees occupying the homes are unrelated to each…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. McNish v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  5. Country Lands, Inc. v. SwinnertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Helicopter Associates, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. City of Ladue v. HornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Grasso v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Groton Long Point Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Armstrong v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. State v. BakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API