Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 23, 2009No. 106, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRELL, Judge.

The land use dispute engendering the present case (and its predecessors, 1 contemporaries, 2 and what may come yet 3 ) represents Baltimore City’s version of the Hundred Years’ War. 4 , 5 The present skirmish involves the interpretation and application of the term “family” as defined by the Baltimore City Zoning Code (“the Code” or “BCZC”).

The Code provides that a “dwelling unit” may be occupied by no more than one “family.” Four unrelated individuals (and no more) who live together comprise a “family,” if they form a “single housekeeping unit.” This case requires us to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. United Steelworkers of America AFL-CIO, Local 2610 v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. MBC Realty, LLC v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Montgomery County v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. South Kaywood Community Ass'n v. LongCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. State of Delaware v. Lewis.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API