Armstrong v. Mayor of Baltimore
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
The land use dispute engendering the present case (and its predecessors, 1 contemporaries, 2 and what may come yet 3 ) represents Baltimore City’s version of the Hundred Years’ War. 4 , 5 The present skirmish involves the interpretation and application of the term “family” as defined by the Baltimore City Zoning Code (“the Code” or “BCZC”).
The Code provides that a “dwelling unit” may be occupied by no more than one “family.” Four unrelated individuals (and no more) who live together comprise a “family,” if they form a “single housekeeping unit.” This case requires us to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- United Steelworkers of America AFL-CIO, Local 2610 v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- MBC Realty, LLC v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Montgomery County v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- South Kaywood Community Ass'n v. LongCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- State of Delaware v. Lewis.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015