Legal Opinion
Erby v. Kula
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2004No. 03-1392PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Maurice Erby, a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Seeking declaratory and monetary relief, Erby sued Jennifer Kula, a Lieutenant at the Ionia Maximum Facility (“IMF”), alleging that the defendant violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights on two occasions, March 20,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dwight E. Freeman v. Warden Francis Corrections Officer Shoemaker Nurse KentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Feathers v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Samuel Donald Hood II v. Samuel Donald HoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. L. David Grable Valerie A. GrableCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. OzmintDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2008
- Bowles v. Tennessee Department of Correctional - CCADistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Dassault Systèmes, SA v. Keith ChildressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- In re Murray Energy HoldingsBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Jack Carpenter, III v. Eric RardinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.