Legal Opinion

Columbus Chain Co. v. Standard Chain Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1906No. 1,532PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from,the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

COCHRAN, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill filed to enjoin the infringement of letters patent No. 620,-836, granted to Daniel Carroll, March 14, 1899, and assigned to appellant, complainant below, April 19, 1900. The answer put in issue both the validity of the patent and its infringement.

The patent is for a device for imparting uniform dimensions to chain-links, i. e., internally. Many chains, such, for instance, as pulley and crane chains which run over toothed wheels or have to fit into pockeis or depressions on the face of wheels, recpiire that the links…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Buser v. Novelty Tufting Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  2. Twentieth Century Machinery Co. v. Loew Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Pleatmaster, Inc. v. J. L. Golding Mfg. Co., and H. L. Judd Company, Counter-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  4. Moline Plow Co. v. Rock Island Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
  5. Oliver Machinery Co. v. GellmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API